This post is more than 2 years old.
This is in response to a question asked of me on Twitter (I'm using Twitter a lot recently, but I'd probably suggest folks use emails for questions as Twitter can be hard to catch up). The user asked potential bottlenecks with cfdocument and cfpdf. This brought up a general suggestion I thought I'd share on the blog. When does it make sense to cache ColdFusion code?
There is no one answer to this. But I can tell you what serves as a red flag to me when coding. Anything operation that involves binary data is probably a candidate for caching. By binary data I mean anything non-text based, and PDFs certainly fall into that category. Images as well. So when I code and do something with cfdocument, I immediately ask myself if this is an operation I can cache so as to not run on every request. This does not mean I must cache these operations. Nor does it imply they are always slow. Again, I'm simply talking about the types of things that make me at least think of possible bottlenecks/slow processes/etc.
As a practical example, when I was building the ColdFusion Cookbook, I knew I was going to have a PDF export option. I also figured that the operation would a) be expensive (due to the size) and b) be an excellent candidate for caching since the content wouldn't be updated often. So I intentionally built it with a simple logical check. When you request the PDF, it will only be generated if it doesn't exist. On the flip side, when I edit content, the cached PDF will be deleted.
Another practical example - when I blogged about jQuery Thickbox and ColdFusion image resizing, I wrote my image manipulation code to only resize once. While ColdFusion probably could handle resizing on every request quickly enough, I thought it was best to save those thumbnails so they wouldn't be regenerated every request.
Remember - most best practices are suggestions, and this blog post is merely that - a suggestion. Happy Sunday all.