This Movie Is Not Yet Rated and C.S.A.

This post is more than 2 years old.

This week I watched two interesting movies, both of which are associated with the Independent Film Channel. The first was This Movie Is Not Yet Rated, a rather scathing look at the MPAA (Movie Picture Association of America) and how ratings are doled out to films. I always knew the organization was a bit weird, but I had no idea how secretive they really were. The movie covered some things most intelligent folks already know - that sex is much more dangerous (in their mind) than violence, so it's ok to shoot the woman in the head, but showing her naked is something else entirely. Now as a parent, I do like having an idea what is in a film, but honestly, I can tell most of the time from the trailers what is appropriate and what isn't. What I didn't agree with is that the MPAA has led to censorship. While films do end up getting cut to get ratings, I think there is a difference between a company trying to maximize profit (by going for an R instead of NC-17) compared to a government cracking down on speech it doesn't like. I think there are plenty of countries in this world - right now - who would love to have our "censorship".

The second film I watched was CSA (Confederate States of America), this is billed as a "mockumentary" about a world where the Confederates won the Civil War. I'm a huge alt-history fan so when I first heard of this film I was pretty intrigued. While the film can be considered alt-history, it's main point was to look at racism as it exists today. One of the most jarring parts of the film are the "advertisements" (the film pretends to be a documentary being shown on television, so it has regular commercial break) - especially when you learn the real world truth behind the ads. Taking it strictly as an alt-history show though I found it enjoyable as the documentary approach was much different than how typical novels read.

Oh yeah - and I watched 300 in HD-DVD as well. I had seen it at the movies so I already knew it rocked - but god dang what a cool movie. I need to pick up the comic sometime.

Raymond Camden's Picture

About Raymond Camden

Raymond is a senior developer evangelist for Adobe. He focuses on document services, JavaScript, and enterprise cat demos. If you like this article, please consider visiting my Amazon Wishlist or donating via PayPal to show your support. You can even buy me a coffee!

Lafayette, LA

Archived Comments

Comment 1 by Kebab Dylan posted on 8/13/2007 at 10:19 PM

i saw part of this film is not yet rated. I can't remember but did they mention that big studios sometimes get away with more than independent movies. ie. possible big money makers get a pg-13 rather then a more deserved R.

I've noticed that. On a side note I beleive i recall them talking about the introduction of pg-13. We let our 9 yearl old daughter watch back to the future this summer. harmless enough, right? ha! the language was just terrible in it!

Comment 2 by Raymond Camden posted on 8/13/2007 at 10:25 PM

Kebab - Yep, I remember that as well. My main point is though that there is a difference between your government preventing you from seeing something and the MPAA giving movies unfair ratings. The MPAA is free to give whatever rating they want, but this movie is doing a good job informing people of how misguided their ratings may be.

Comment 3 by Kebab Dylan posted on 8/13/2007 at 10:54 PM

i agree. it's not censorship. just not very fair.